PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXN vs. VDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXN vs. VDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FXN having a 34.12% return and VDE slightly lower at 33.37%. Over the past 10 years, FXN has underperformed VDE with an annualized return of 6.54%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.64% annualized return.


FXN

1D
-0.77%
1M
8.88%
6M
23.33%
YTD
34.12%
1Y
45.83%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
19.56%
10Y*
6.54%
ALL TIME*
2.12%

VDE

1D
-1.25%
1M
10.26%
6M
19.00%
YTD
33.37%
1Y
42.10%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
23.88%
10Y*
9.64%
ALL TIME*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.82M$9.25M$37.23M
$74.74M$74.12M$109.67M

FXN vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
34.12%3.39%0.27%0.97%46.92%51.79%-19.91%-6.76%-24.79%-5.02%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
33.37%7.11%6.75%0.03%62.89%56.31%-33.02%9.28%-19.95%-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FXN and VDE is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.93

The correlation between FXN and VDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXN vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXN
VDE

Energy

90.0%
76.9%

Technology

5.0%

-

Financial Services

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Energy

FXN
90.0%
VDE
76.9%

Technology

FXN
5.0%
VDE

-

Financial Services

FXN
2.5%
VDE

-

Basic Materials

FXN

-

VDE
0.4%

Communication Services

FXN

-

VDE

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXN

-

VDE

-

Consumer Defensive

FXN

-

VDE

-

Healthcare

FXN

-

VDE

-

Industrials

FXN

-

VDE
0.3%

Real Estate

FXN

-

VDE

-

Utilities

FXN

-

VDE
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXN vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXN
FXN Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXN vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXNVDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.81

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

7.57

+1.01

FXN vs. VDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VDE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXN and VDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXN vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than VDE's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and VDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNVDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-74.20%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-15.04%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.69%

-21.41%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-26.58%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.63%

-69.29%

-11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-5.63%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.73%

-19.88%

-17.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

5.58%

-0.22%

Volatility

FXN vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) have volatilities of 6.21% and 6.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXNVDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

6.26%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

16.71%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.15%

20.92%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.71%

26.15%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.80%

29.91%

+4.89%

FXN vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXN vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison

FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VDE's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
1.63%2.53%2.50%3.09%2.28%0.87%4.71%1.47%1.43%1.17%1.05%2.36%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.43%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FXN and VDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VDE has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to FXN (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs VDE's -74.20%.

On 10-year performance, VDE leads with 9.64% vs 6.54% for FXN. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VDE has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.63% for FXN.

FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.09% for VDE.

VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXN and VDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer