PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXN vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXN vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 36.33% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FXN has underperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 6.10%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


FXN

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
36.33%
6M
30.66%
1Y
55.14%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
17.36%
10Y*
6.10%

NFTY

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-8.94%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
-7.39%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXN vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
36.33%3.39%0.27%0.97%46.92%51.79%-19.91%-6.76%-24.79%-5.02%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-8.94%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FXN and NFTY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2012

0.20

The correlation between FXN and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXN vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXN
NFTY

Energy

95.4%
8.5%

Technology

4.6%
9.2%

Basic Materials

-

12.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

16.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.3%

Financial Services

-

21.2%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

4.0%

Energy

FXN
95.4%
NFTY
8.5%

Technology

FXN
4.6%
NFTY
9.2%

Basic Materials

FXN

-

NFTY
12.5%

Communication Services

FXN

-

NFTY
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FXN

-

NFTY
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

FXN

-

NFTY
8.3%

Financial Services

FXN

-

NFTY
21.2%

Healthcare

FXN

-

NFTY
9.7%

Industrials

FXN

-

NFTY
8.3%

Real Estate

FXN

-

NFTY

-

Utilities

FXN

-

NFTY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXN vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXN
FXN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXN vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXNNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.93

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

-0.46

+5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.26

-1.20

+14.47

FXN vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXN and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXNNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

-0.50

+2.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.28

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.40

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.28

-0.22

Drawdowns

FXN vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than NFTY's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-47.67%

-39.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-16.14%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.69%

-21.55%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-21.55%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.63%

-47.67%

-32.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-16.76%

+13.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.98%

-9.58%

-28.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

6.16%

-1.99%

Volatility

FXN vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.59%. This indicates that FXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXNNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

4.59%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.01%

12.58%

+4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

14.73%

+8.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.92%

17.38%

+11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.99%

20.71%

+14.28%

FXN vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXN vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than NFTY's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
1.76%2.53%2.50%3.09%2.28%0.87%4.71%1.47%1.43%1.17%1.05%2.36%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.94%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXN and NFTY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXN has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to NFTY (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 8.17% vs 6.10% for FXN. On fees, FXN is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXN is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.76% for FXN.

FXN is categorized as Energy Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.80% for NFTY.

FXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXN and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer