FXN vs. NBET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) and NBET (Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. FXN is passively managed, while NBET is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FXN returned 13.95%/yr vs 19.86%/yr for NBET. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXN charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for NBET.

Performance

FXN vs. NBET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 25.36% return, which is significantly higher than NBET's 20.80% return.

FXN

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -7.84%
• YTD: 25.36%
• 6M: 25.74%
• 1Y: 36.81%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 15.13%
• 10Y*: 5.82%

NBET

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -5.87%
• YTD: 20.80%
• 6M: 20.90%
• 1Y: 23.09%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXN vs. NBET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund	25.36%	3.39%	0.27%	0.97%	11.28%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	20.80%	5.87%	30.30%	7.48%	-6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FXN and NBET is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022	0.62

The correlation between FXN and NBET shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXN vs. NBET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXN	NBET
Energy	92.2%	88.7%
Technology	7.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	2.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	9.0%

Return for Risk

FXN vs. NBET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXN

FXN Risk / Return Rank: 49
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 51

NBET

NBET Risk / Return Rank: 51
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXN vs. NBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXN	NBET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.59	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.15	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.90	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	7.90	+0.18

FXN vs. NBET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the NBET Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXN and NBET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXN vs. NBET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than NBET's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and NBET.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXN	NBET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.39%	-18.72%	-68.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.99%	-8.00%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.69%	-18.72%	-12.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.26%	-6.98%	-4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.90%	-5.07%	-32.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	2.93%	+1.64%

Volatility

FXN vs. NBET - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) at 4.77%. This indicates that FXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXN	NBET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.38%	4.77%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.15%	11.00%	+6.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.85%	14.66%	+9.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.95%	19.48%	+9.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.94%	19.48%	+15.46%

FXN vs. NBET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NBET's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXN vs. NBET - Dividend Comparison

FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than NBET's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund	1.91%	2.53%	2.50%	3.09%	2.28%	0.87%	4.71%	1.47%	1.43%	1.17%	1.05%	2.36%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.70%	2.43%	1.22%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXN and NBET in my portfolio?

FXN and NBET have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXN or NBET?

FXN has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to NBET (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs NBET's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, FXN or NBET?

On 3-year performance, NBET leads with 19.86% vs 13.95% for FXN. On fees, FXN is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, NBET has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXN or NBET?

Over the 3-year period, NBET has performed better with a 19.86% return vs 13.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXN or NBET?

FXN is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for NBET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXN or NBET?

FXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.71% for NBET.

What is the main difference between FXN and NBET?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.65% for NBET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.