PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. MSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 23.89% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -48.72% return.


FXL

1D
-3.19%
1M
3.12%
YTD
23.89%
6M
21.72%
1Y
37.39%
3Y*
23.75%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
20.80%

MSDD

1D
0.00%
1M
44.94%
YTD
-48.72%
6M
-45.00%
1Y
69.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FXL and MSDD is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

-0.47

FXL vs. MSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
MSDD

Technology

88.5%
200.1%

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Industrials

3.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Financial Services

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FXL
88.5%
MSDD
200.1%

Communication Services

FXL
4.8%
MSDD

-

Industrials

FXL
3.8%
MSDD

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
MSDD

-

Financial Services

FXL
1.0%
MSDD

-

Basic Materials

FXL

-

MSDD

-

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

MSDD

-

Energy

FXL

-

MSDD

-

Healthcare

FXL

-

MSDD

-

Real Estate

FXL

-

MSDD

-

Utilities

FXL

-

MSDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDD
MSDD Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLMSDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

0.82

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

1.63

+7.16

FXL vs. MSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the MSDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and MSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXL vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and MSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLMSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-84.91%

+23.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-84.91%

+71.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-68.63%

+61.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-31.26%

+19.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

43.14%

-38.88%

Volatility

FXL vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) is 12.05%, while GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) has a volatility of 32.28%. This indicates that FXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLMSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

32.28%

-20.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

124.65%

-105.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.24%

140.94%

-116.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.48%

138.85%

-113.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

138.85%

-113.42%

FXL vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FXL nor MSDD has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and MSDD have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSDD has higher volatility (32.28%) compared to FXL (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs MSDD's -84.91%.

On 1-year performance, MSDD leads with 69.58% vs 37.39% for FXL. On fees, FXL is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 12.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSDD has performed better with a 69.58% return vs 37.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXL is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

FXL and MSDD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while MSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 1.50% for MSDD.

FXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and MSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer