PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. GTEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly lower than GTEK's 42.08% return.


FXL

1D
-2.00%
1M
-3.96%
6M
16.27%
YTD
20.92%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
19.83%

GTEK

1D
-4.38%
1M
-3.33%
6M
34.40%
YTD
42.08%
1Y
59.49%
3Y*
29.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
20.92%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%3.30%
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
42.08%23.68%15.94%33.58%-46.73%-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and GTEK is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.92

The correlation between FXL and GTEK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
GTEK

Technology

89.9%
74.5%

Communication Services

5.2%
3.7%

Industrials

3.7%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
4.9%

Financial Services

0.5%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FXL
89.9%
GTEK
74.5%

Communication Services

FXL
5.2%
GTEK
3.7%

Industrials

FXL
3.7%
GTEK
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
0.8%
GTEK
4.9%

Financial Services

FXL
0.5%
GTEK
1.2%

Basic Materials

FXL

-

GTEK
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

GTEK

-

Energy

FXL

-

GTEK

-

Healthcare

FXL

-

GTEK
1.1%

Real Estate

FXL

-

GTEK
2.3%

Utilities

FXL

-

GTEK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GTEK
GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLGTEKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

5.37

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

15.79

-9.07

FXL vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXL vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than GTEK's maximum drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and GTEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLGTEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-53.77%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-11.13%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-27.49%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.19%

-9.70%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-26.99%

+15.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

3.78%

+0.78%

Volatility

FXL vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) is 9.85%, while Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that FXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLGTEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

12.78%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

26.10%

-5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.05%

29.74%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.66%

28.82%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.46%

28.82%

-3.36%

FXL vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

Neither FXL nor GTEK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and GTEK have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTEK has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to FXL (9.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 29.45% vs 20.06% for FXL. On fees, FXL is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 9.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 29.45% return vs 20.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXL is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

FXL and GTEK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.75% for GTEK.

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and GTEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer