PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.


FXL

1D
-0.88%
1M
17.50%
YTD
31.98%
6M
30.18%
1Y
48.07%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
21.15%

CHPS

1D
1.86%
1M
32.32%
YTD
107.97%
6M
109.04%
1Y
223.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
31.98%13.29%16.13%7.59%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
107.97%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and CHPS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023

0.80

The correlation between FXL and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
CHPS

Technology

88.1%
98.8%

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Industrials

4.5%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Financial Services

0.6%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FXL
88.1%
CHPS
98.8%

Communication Services

FXL
5.9%
CHPS

-

Industrials

FXL
4.5%
CHPS
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
CHPS

-

Financial Services

FXL
0.6%
CHPS
0.2%

Basic Materials

FXL

-

CHPS

-

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

CHPS

-

Energy

FXL

-

CHPS
0.5%

Healthcare

FXL

-

CHPS

-

Real Estate

FXL

-

CHPS

-

Utilities

FXL

-

CHPS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXLCHPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.81

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

12.87

-9.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

49.99

-38.04

FXL vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXLCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

6.54

-4.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.81

-1.25

Drawdowns

FXL vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and CHPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-39.44%

-21.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-17.50%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

0.00%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-9.16%

-2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

4.50%

-0.47%

Volatility

FXL vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) is 7.61%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that FXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

14.18%

-6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

28.19%

-10.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

34.43%

-12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

33.78%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.28%

33.78%

-8.50%

FXL vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.32%0.68%1.75%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and CHPS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to FXL (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 48.07% for FXL. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 48.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.15% for CHPS.

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and CHPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer