FXL vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Technology Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FXL returned 34.37% vs 185.23% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

FXL vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 105.66% return.

FXL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 23.68%
• 6M: 21.04%
• 1Y: 34.37%
• 3Y*: 23.68%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 20.78%

CHPS

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 12.97%
• YTD: 105.66%
• 6M: 105.80%
• 1Y: 185.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund	23.68%	13.29%	16.13%	9.87%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	105.66%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and CHPS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.81

The correlation between FXL and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXL	CHPS
Technology	88.5%	99.6%
Communication Services	4.8%	0.0%
Industrials	3.8%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	0.0%
Financial Services	1.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FXL vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL

FXL Risk / Return Rank: 48
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXL	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	4.70	-3.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	4.49	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.63	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	10.66	-8.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.04	39.00	-30.96

FXL vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXL vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXL	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.41%	-39.44%	-21.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.56%	-17.50%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.11%	-9.68%	+2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-9.08%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	4.77%	-0.48%

Volatility

FXL vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) is 11.69%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 22.69%. This indicates that FXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXL	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.69%	22.69%	-11.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	34.28%	-14.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.23%	39.83%	-15.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.48%	35.51%	-10.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.42%	35.51%	-10.09%

FXL vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXL vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund	0.00%	0.01%	0.11%	0.41%	0.34%	0.11%	0.04%	0.37%	0.32%	0.27%	1.12%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXL and CHPS in my portfolio?

FXL and CHPS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXL or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (22.69%) compared to FXL (11.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, FXL or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 185.23% vs 34.37% for FXL. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 11.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXL or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 185.23% return vs 34.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXL or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXL or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

What is the main difference between FXL and CHPS?

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.