FXL vs. CHPS
FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Technology Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FXL returned 48.07% vs 223.67% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
FXL vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
FXL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXL vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 31.98% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 7.59% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXL and CHPS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FXL and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXL vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXL
CHPS
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FXL
CHPS
Communication Services
FXL
CHPS
-
Industrials
FXL
CHPS
Consumer Cyclical
FXL
CHPS
-
Financial Services
FXL
CHPS
Basic Materials
FXL
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
FXL
-
CHPS
-
Energy
FXL
-
CHPS
Healthcare
FXL
-
CHPS
-
Real Estate
FXL
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
FXL
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXL vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
FXL
CHPS
FXL vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXL | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.81 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 12.87 | -9.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | 49.99 | -38.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXL | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 6.54 | -4.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.81 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
FXL vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXL | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -39.44% | -21.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | -17.50% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | 0.00% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -9.16% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 4.50% | -0.47% |
Volatility
FXL vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) is 7.61%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that FXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXL | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 14.18% | -6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 28.19% | -10.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 34.43% | -12.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 33.78% | -8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 33.78% | -8.50% |
FXL vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXL vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXL and CHPS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to FXL (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 48.07% for FXL. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 48.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.
FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXL and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer