PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXIEX vs. MUJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXIEX achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than MUJ's 3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FXIEX has outperformed MUJ with an annualized return of 2.70%, while MUJ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.09% annualized return.


FXIEX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.82%
6M
0.25%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
2.70%
ALL TIME*
2.10%

MUJ

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.57%
6M
0.09%
YTD
3.83%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
2.09%
ALL TIME*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$969.39K$870.71K$1.11M

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXIEX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE
0.76%3.37%5.16%8.92%-10.89%2.19%7.22%8.45%1.00%7.71%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
3.83%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FXIEX and MUJ is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2012

0.29

The correlation between FXIEX and MUJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXIEX vs. MUJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXIEX
FXIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FXIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FXIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXIEXMUJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

1.71

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

6.89

+2.01

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the MUJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXIEX and MUJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXIEX drawdown since its inception was -15.25%, smaller than the maximum MUJ drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXIEX and MUJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXIEXMUJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-41.72%

+26.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-9.41%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.56%

-11.04%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.25%

-32.71%

+17.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.25%

-32.71%

+17.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-4.21%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-9.00%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

2.33%

-1.58%

Volatility

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) is 0.84%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that FXIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXIEXMUJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

1.60%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

6.86%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

8.76%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

10.33%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

11.12%

-7.02%

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXIEX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MUJ's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXIEX vs. MUJ - Dividend Comparison

FXIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than MUJ's 5.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXIEX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE
2.41%2.75%4.53%3.98%3.25%2.63%3.37%3.63%3.79%2.67%0.00%0.00%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.41%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXIEX and MUJ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to FXIEX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXIEX dropped -15.25% vs MUJ's -41.72%.

FXIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXIEX and MUJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer