FXI vs. NAIL
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and NAIL (Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while NAIL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 3.13%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for NAIL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NAIL.
Performance
FXI vs. NAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly higher than NAIL's -13.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed NAIL with an annualized return of 3.13%, while NAIL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.16% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
NAIL
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 25.39%
- YTD
- -13.15%
- 6M
- -27.97%
- 1Y
- -17.64%
- 3Y*
- -11.92%
- 5Y*
- -9.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
FXI vs. NAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares | -13.15% | -40.43% | -22.83% | 259.61% | -75.23% | 168.20% | -32.08% | 184.63% | -73.96% | 268.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and NAIL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015 | 0.30 |
FXI vs. NAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
NAIL
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FXI
NAIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
NAIL
Communication Services
FXI
NAIL
-
Technology
FXI
NAIL
-
Energy
FXI
NAIL
-
Industrials
FXI
NAIL
Basic Materials
FXI
NAIL
Healthcare
FXI
NAIL
-
Real Estate
FXI
NAIL
Consumer Defensive
FXI
NAIL
-
Utilities
FXI
NAIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. NAIL — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
NAIL
FXI vs. NAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | NAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.04 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | -0.26 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | -0.45 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. NAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, smaller than the maximum NAIL drawdown of -93.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and NAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | NAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -93.75% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -67.85% | +51.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -82.09% | +53.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.94% | -84.40% | +29.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -93.75% | +32.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | -75.18% | +47.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -43.87% | +12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 39.36% | -31.70% |
Volatility
FXI vs. NAIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.22%, while Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) has a volatility of 26.93%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | NAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 26.93% | -20.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 61.98% | -47.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 88.92% | -69.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 87.27% | -55.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 89.35% | -61.71% |
FXI vs. NAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than NAIL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. NAIL - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than NAIL's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares | 0.91% | 1.55% | 0.63% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.17% | 0.35% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and NAIL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAIL has higher volatility (26.93%) compared to FXI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs NAIL's -93.75%.
On 10-year performance, NAIL leads with 6.16% vs 3.13% for FXI. On fees, FXI is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NAIL has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXI is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NAIL.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.91% for NAIL.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while NAIL is Leveraged Equities. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while NAIL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.99% for NAIL.
FXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and NAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer