FXI vs. MINT
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. FXI is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 2.48%/yr vs 2.75%/yr for MINT. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
FXI vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 2.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of 2.48%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.75% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 11.05%
- 6M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- -2.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.52%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 2.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $719.56M | $757.31M | $954.29M | |
| $158.65M | $162.42M | $156.49M |
FXI vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -5.06% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 2.56% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and MINT is -0.10, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009 | -0.01 |
The correlation between FXI and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
MINT
FXI vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -51.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 14.88 | -13.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 91.19 | -91.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 705.26 | -705.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -4.62% | -68.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.94% | -0.05% | -22.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.28% | -0.16% | -25.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -2.42% | -47.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -4.62% | -56.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.24% | 0.00% | -25.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.20% | -0.17% | -31.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.08% | 0.01% | +10.07% |
Volatility
FXI vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that FXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 0.09% | +5.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 0.22% | +14.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.17% | 0.28% | +19.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 0.58% | +30.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 0.94% | +26.66% |
FXI vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than MINT's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 1.88% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.19% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and MINT have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXI has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 10-year performance, MINT leads with 2.75% vs 2.48% for FXI. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MINT has performed better with a 2.75% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.88% for FXI.
FXI is categorized as China Equities, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.97 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer