FXI vs. KJD
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) are both China Equities funds. FXI is passively managed, while KJD is actively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for KJD.
Performance
FXI vs. KJD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly lower than KJD's 24.47% return.
FXI
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 14.38%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- 0.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.58%
KJD
- 1D
- 4.42%
- 1M
- 51.02%
- 6M
- 28.51%
- YTD
- 24.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $773.89M | $798.32M | $975.73M | |
| $81.29K | $62.29K | $79.36K |
FXI vs. KJD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -3.96% | -1.76% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 24.47% | -28.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and KJD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. KJD — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
KJD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXI vs. KJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. KJD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than KJD's maximum drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and KJD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -50.81% | -21.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.37% | -16.87% | -7.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -30.11% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.00% | — | — |
Volatility
FXI vs. KJD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.32% | 60.95% | -40.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 60.95% | -29.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 60.95% | -33.35% |
FXI vs. KJD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than KJD's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. KJD - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, while KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 1.86% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and KJD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FXI is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FXI is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 1.26% for KJD.
Find the right allocation for FXI and KJD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer