FXI vs. IQQC.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE).

FXI and IQQC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. IQQC.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004. Both FXI and IQQC.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	-7.13%	28.95%	28.98%	-12.42%	-20.66%	-20.06%	8.92%	14.90%	-13.28%	36.26%
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	-7.53%	29.06%	31.16%	-13.68%	-18.13%	-22.02%	8.57%	15.56%	-13.37%	35.46%

Different Trading Currencies

FXI is traded in USD, while IQQC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IQQC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly higher than IQQC.DE's -7.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXI having a 3.03% annualized return and IQQC.DE not far ahead at 3.15%.

FXI

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -3.63%
• YTD: -7.13%
• 6M: -13.13%
• 1Y: 1.94%
• 3Y*: 9.04%
• 5Y*: -3.44%
• 10Y*: 3.03%

IQQC.DE

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: -7.53%
• 6M: -12.53%
• 1Y: 1.98%
• 3Y*: 9.18%
• 5Y*: -3.35%
• 10Y*: 3.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FXI and IQQC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

FXI

iShares China Large-Cap ETF

IQQC.DE

iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

FXI vs. IQQC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXI

FXI Risk / Return Rank: 14
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 14

IQQC.DE

IQQC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
IQQC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
IQQC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
IQQC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
IQQC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
IQQC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXI	IQQC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	0.09	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	0.27	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.03	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	0.20	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	0.53	-0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is comparable to the IQQC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXI and IQQC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXI	IQQC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08	0.09	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	-0.11	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.12	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.07	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between FXI and IQQC.DE is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Dividend Comparison

FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than IQQC.DE's 1.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	2.60%	2.42%	1.76%	3.17%	2.61%	1.60%	2.19%	2.74%	2.69%	2.31%	2.69%	2.90%
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	1.91%	1.78%	2.26%	2.52%	2.51%	1.85%	2.51%	2.45%	3.03%	2.38%	2.33%	2.63%

Drawdowns

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IQQC.DE drawdown of -71.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and IQQC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXI	IQQC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.68%	-67.50%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.74%	-16.05%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.14%	-48.43%	-6.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.81%	-53.92%	-6.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.87%	-23.47%	-3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.27%	-28.21%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.89%	5.78%	+0.11%

Volatility

FXI vs. IQQC.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) at 5.75%. This indicates that FXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXI	IQQC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.74%	5.75%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.71%	12.98%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.29%	21.71%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.64%	29.74%	+1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.70%	26.10%	+1.60%