IQQC.DE vs. VXUS

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS).

IQQC.DE and VXUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQC.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004. VXUS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. Both IQQC.DE and VXUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	-6.69%	14.32%	39.12%	-16.33%	-13.36%	-15.34%	-1.10%	18.05%	-9.09%	18.68%
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	4.67%	16.64%	12.01%	12.39%	-10.88%	17.14%	1.54%	24.50%	-10.41%	11.79%

Different Trading Currencies

IQQC.DE is traded in EUR, while VXUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VXUS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQC.DE has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 2.93%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.87% annualized return.

IQQC.DE

• 1D: -13.92%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: -6.69%
• 6M: -13.15%
• 1Y: -3.88%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: -3.13%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

VXUS

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 4.67%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 13.25%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: 8.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.

IQQC.DE

iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF

VXUS

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF

Return for Risk

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQC.DE

IQQC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
IQQC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
IQQC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IQQC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IQQC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
IQQC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

VXUS

VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 80
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQQC.DE	VXUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	1.19	-1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	1.67	-1.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.26	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	1.66	-1.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	7.08	-7.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQC.DE and VXUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQQC.DE	VXUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	1.19	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.59	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.56	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.45	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between IQQC.DE and VXUS is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than VXUS's 2.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	1.92%	1.78%	2.26%	2.52%	2.51%	1.85%	2.51%	2.45%	3.03%	2.38%	2.33%	2.63%
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	2.95%	3.18%	3.37%	3.24%	3.09%	3.10%	2.14%	3.06%	3.18%	2.73%	2.93%	2.83%

Drawdowns

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and VXUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQQC.DE	VXUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.50%	-35.97%	-31.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.16%	-11.27%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.43%	-29.44%	-18.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.92%	-35.97%	-17.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.77%	-7.89%	-15.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.20%	-8.29%	-19.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.35%	2.99%	+2.36%

Volatility

IQQC.DE vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a higher volatility of 22.42% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 6.65%. This indicates that IQQC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQQC.DE	VXUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.42%	6.65%	+15.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.71%	10.49%	+14.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.99%	16.98%	+13.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.72%	13.47%	+16.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.01%	16.00%	+10.01%