FXI vs. IBIT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT).
FXI and IBIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. IBIT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 5, 2024. Both FXI and IBIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FXI vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXI vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -6.24% | 28.95% | 35.76% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -22.62% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.
FXI
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -11.79%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
IBIT
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- -22.62%
- 6M
- -40.89%
- 1Y
- -17.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXI vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
IBIT
FXI vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXI | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | -0.40 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | -0.29 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.97 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | -0.39 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | -0.83 | +1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXI | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | -0.40 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.35 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and IBIT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FXI vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.58% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXI vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and IBIT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -49.36% | -23.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.25% | -49.36% | +32.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.17% | -46.11% | +19.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.27% | -14.13% | -17.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 23.09% | -17.24% |
Volatility
FXI vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 7.06%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 12.99% | -5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 36.75% | -22.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.27% | 45.42% | -21.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 51.26% | -19.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 51.26% | -23.56% |