FXI vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
FXI and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both FXI and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FXI vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXI vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.13% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | -0.93% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | 3.53% | 41.54% | 35.95% | -26.56% | 30.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's -0.93% return.
FXI
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -7.13%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- -3.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
CNYA
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- -1.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXI vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
CNYA
FXI vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXI | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.08 | 1.34 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.28 | 1.84 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.27 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 2.15 | -2.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 9.28 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXI | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 1.34 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | -0.06 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.23 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and CNYA is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FXI vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than CNYA's 1.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.60% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.93% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXI vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and CNYA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -49.49% | -23.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | -11.47% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.14% | -45.11% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.87% | -21.52% | -5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.27% | -20.77% | -10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 2.67% | +3.22% |
Volatility
FXI vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 4.99%. This indicates that FXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 4.99% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.71% | 11.62% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 18.85% | +5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 23.71% | +7.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 23.60% | +4.10% |