FXH vs. USFR
FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Health Care Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXH returned 7.49%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for USFR. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXH charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
FXH vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FXH has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 7.49%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.
FXH
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
FXH vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 2.70% | 10.16% | 0.96% | -4.53% | -12.24% | 15.20% | 28.00% | 22.26% | -1.33% | 21.82% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.82% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXH and USFR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | 0.00 |
The correlation between FXH and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXH vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
FXH
USFR
FXH vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXH | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -48.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 13.31 | -12.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 201.33 | -200.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 779.76 | -775.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXH vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXH | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -1.36% | -42.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -0.02% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.53% | -0.06% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.49% | -0.18% | -29.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.61% | -0.80% | -29.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | 0.00% | -7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -0.15% | -9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 0.01% | +4.01% |
Volatility
FXH vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that FXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXH | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 0.09% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.44% | 0.19% | +11.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 0.27% | +15.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 0.40% | +16.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 0.78% | +17.69% |
FXH vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXH vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.83% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXH and USFR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXH has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 10-year performance, FXH leads with 7.49% vs 2.43% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXH has performed better with a 7.49% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.83% for FXH.
FXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXH and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer