PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXH vs. PSCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXH vs. PSCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than PSCH's 1.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXH having a 7.03% annualized return and PSCH not far behind at 6.81%.


FXH

1D
1.48%
1M
1.65%
YTD
0.68%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
7.03%

PSCH

1D
1.28%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
1.80%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
-5.72%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXH vs. PSCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.68%10.16%0.96%-4.53%-12.24%15.20%28.00%22.26%-1.33%21.82%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
1.80%-0.49%3.77%-2.71%-25.15%5.75%31.47%20.17%9.15%34.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FXH and PSCH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.82

The correlation between FXH and PSCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXH vs. PSCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXH
PSCH

Healthcare

100.0%
97.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.1%

Industrials

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FXH
100.0%
PSCH
97.3%

Basic Materials

FXH

-

PSCH

-

Communication Services

FXH

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXH

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Defensive

FXH

-

PSCH

-

Energy

FXH

-

PSCH

-

Financial Services

FXH

-

PSCH
1.1%

Industrials

FXH

-

PSCH
0.7%

Real Estate

FXH

-

PSCH

-

Technology

FXH

-

PSCH
1.7%

Utilities

FXH

-

PSCH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXH vs. PSCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXH
FXH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXH vs. PSCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXHPSCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.10

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.67

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

1.84

+1.49

FXH vs. PSCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXH Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the PSCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXH and PSCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXHPSCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.51

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

-0.25

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.51

0.00

Drawdowns

FXH vs. PSCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, smaller than the maximum PSCH drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and PSCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXHPSCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-46.32%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-15.36%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-22.98%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

-46.32%

+16.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

-46.32%

+15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-30.59%

+21.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-13.46%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

5.54%

-1.55%

Volatility

FXH vs. PSCH - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXHPSCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.19%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

14.06%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

20.26%

-4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

22.89%

-6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

23.63%

-5.16%

FXH vs. PSCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCH's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXH vs. PSCH - Dividend Comparison

FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than PSCH's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.85%0.75%0.41%0.24%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXH and PSCH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCH has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to FXH (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs PSCH's -46.32%.

On 10-year performance, FXH leads with 7.03% vs 6.81% for PSCH. On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXH has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.

FXH has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.01% for PSCH.

FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.29% for PSCH.

FXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXH and PSCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer