FXH vs. MHIP
FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) and MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. FXH is passively managed, while MHIP is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXH charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MHIP.
Performance
FXH vs. MHIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXH
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
MHIP
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXH vs. MHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 6.83% |
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXH and MHIP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXH vs. MHIP — Risk / Return Rank
FXH
MHIP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXH vs. MHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXH | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXH vs. MHIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than MHIP's maximum drawdown of -3.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and MHIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXH | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -3.09% | -40.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -1.99% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -1.27% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | — | — |
Volatility
FXH vs. MHIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXH | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 11.68% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 11.68% | +4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 11.68% | +6.80% |
FXH vs. MHIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than MHIP's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXH vs. MHIP - Dividend Comparison
FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while MHIP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.84% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% |
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXH and MHIP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MHIP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MHIP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.
FXH has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for MHIP.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Milliman. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.55% for MHIP.
Find the right allocation for FXH and MHIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer