PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXH vs. BTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXH vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FXH

1D
1.48%
1M
1.65%
YTD
0.68%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
7.03%

BTEC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXH vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


FXH vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXH
BTEC

Healthcare

100.0%
99.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FXH
100.0%
BTEC
99.4%

Basic Materials

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Communication Services

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Energy

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Financial Services

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Industrials

FXH

-

BTEC
0.6%

Real Estate

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Technology

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Utilities

FXH

-

BTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXH vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXH
FXH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXH vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXHBTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

FXH vs. BTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXHBTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

Drawdowns

FXH vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and BTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXHBTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

0.00%

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

0.00%

-9.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

0.00%

-9.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

Volatility

FXH vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXHBTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

0.00%

+15.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

0.00%

+16.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

0.00%

+18.47%

FXH vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXH vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BTEC
Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.85%0.75%0.41%0.24%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.

FXH has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.42% for BTEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXH and BTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer