PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc) (FXGB.L) and Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FXGB.L is traded in GBp, while FLRG.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXGB.L achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than FLRG.L's -1.53% return.


FXGB.L

1D
0.47%
1M
1.70%
6M
5.78%
YTD
6.71%
1Y
11.40%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*

FLRG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.05%
6M
-1.46%
YTD
-1.53%
1Y
-0.10%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FXGB.L
First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc)
6.71%7.73%5.81%10.67%-1.83%-2.87%-1.20%1.08%
FLRG.L
Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-1.53%5.97%-1.90%5.56%-14.81%-8.76%11.42%2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FXGB.L and FLRG.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019

-0.13

The correlation between FXGB.L and FLRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.03 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXGB.L
FXGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FXGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FXGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRG.L
FLRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc) (FXGB.L) and Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXGB.LFLRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.99

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

-0.10

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

-0.21

+7.53

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXGB.L and FLRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXGB.L drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum FLRG.L drawdown of -26.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXGB.L and FLRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXGB.LFLRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-26.99%

+17.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.33%

-3.78%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.86%

-4.90%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.66%

-21.56%

+13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.18%

+18.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-15.29%

+12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.77%

-0.22%

Volatility

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc) (FXGB.L) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L) at 1.31%. This indicates that FXGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXGB.LFLRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

1.31%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

3.79%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

5.03%

+6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.87%

6.77%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

7.20%

-0.45%

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXGB.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXGB.L vs. FLRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FXGB.L nor FLRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FXGB.L and FLRG.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLRG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FXGB.L.

FXGB.L is categorized as Currency, while FLRG.L is Global Bonds. FXGB.L tracks Bloomberg G10 Carry Index, while FLRG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate EUR Green Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FXGB.L and 0.25% for FLRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXGB.L and FLRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer