FLRG.L vs. FREM.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FLRG.L (Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and FREM.L (Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLRG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc), while FREM.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRG.L returned -2.18%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for FREM.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLRG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FREM.L.

Performance

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L) and Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF (FREM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FLRG.L is traded in EUR, while FREM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FREM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG.L achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than FREM.L's 16.48% return.

FLRG.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 1Y: 1.35%
• 3Y*: 3.27%
• 5Y*: -2.18%
• 10Y*: —

FREM.L

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.82%
• 6M: 11.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 16.26%
• 5Y*: 7.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLRG.L Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.63%	0.59%	2.78%	7.71%	-18.99%	-3.01%	5.46%	3.44%
FREM.L Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF	16.48%	12.60%	13.28%	9.15%	-14.30%	15.09%	-6.51%	4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG.L and FREM.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019	0.04

Over the past year, FLRG.L and FREM.L have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG.L

FLRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FLRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FLRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FLRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FLRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FREM.L

FREM.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
FREM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FREM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FREM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FREM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FREM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L) and Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF (FREM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLRG.L	FREM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.72	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	2.45	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.30	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	3.05	-2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	9.48	-7.86

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FREM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG.L and FREM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.17%, smaller than the maximum FREM.L drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG.L and FREM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRG.L	FREM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.17%	-32.88%	+9.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.48%	-8.28%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.41%	-13.24%	+9.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.63%	-18.58%	-4.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.19%	-2.15%	-10.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.42%	-7.14%	-3.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	2.67%	-1.78%

Volatility

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L) is 1.02%, while Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF (FREM.L) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that FLRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FREM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRG.L	FREM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	4.29%	-3.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.98%	12.49%	-9.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61%	14.69%	-11.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.37%	14.33%	-8.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.99%	16.51%	-11.52%

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FREM.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLRG.L vs. FREM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLRG.L nor FREM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRG.L and FREM.L in my portfolio?

FLRG.L and FREM.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLRG.L or FREM.L?

On fees, FLRG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLRG.L or FREM.L?

FLRG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FREM.L.

What is the main difference between FLRG.L and FREM.L?

FLRG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while FREM.L is Global Equities. FLRG.L tracks Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc), while FREM.L tracks Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLRG.L and 0.45% for FREM.L.