PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXG vs. PHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXG vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 13.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FXG has underperformed PHDG with an annualized return of 4.23%, while PHDG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.22% annualized return.


FXG

1D
0.06%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-1.44%
1Y
-2.29%
3Y*
0.94%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
4.23%

PHDG

1D
-0.63%
1M
4.88%
YTD
13.79%
6M
11.91%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXG vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
-0.18%-2.66%3.21%1.97%3.28%21.73%4.85%20.65%-11.49%7.87%
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
13.79%2.72%10.95%8.18%-14.09%15.67%18.97%8.57%-2.44%15.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FXG and PHDG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2012

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between FXG and PHDG has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXG vs. PHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXG
PHDG

Consumer Defensive

79.9%
5.0%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
10.1%

Industrials

4.1%
8.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.0%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.1%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

FXG
79.9%
PHDG
5.0%

Healthcare

FXG
8.2%
PHDG
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FXG
7.9%
PHDG
10.1%

Industrials

FXG
4.1%
PHDG
8.3%

Basic Materials

FXG
2.0%
PHDG
1.8%

Communication Services

FXG

-

PHDG
11.0%

Energy

FXG

-

PHDG
3.6%

Financial Services

FXG

-

PHDG
11.9%

Real Estate

FXG

-

PHDG
1.9%

Technology

FXG

-

PHDG
35.1%

Utilities

FXG

-

PHDG
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXG vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXG
FXG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PHDG
PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXG vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXGPHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.53

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

7.19

-7.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

26.70

-27.13

FXG vs. PHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXG Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the PHDG Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXG and PHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXGPHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

2.88

-3.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.50

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.61

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.53

-0.06

Drawdowns

FXG vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than PHDG's maximum drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and PHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXGPHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-17.70%

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-3.52%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.75%

-14.78%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.70%

-17.06%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.54%

-17.06%

-10.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.70%

-0.87%

-11.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-6.25%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

0.95%

+4.46%

Volatility

FXG vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXGPHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.07%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

6.64%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

8.81%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

10.92%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

11.92%

+3.00%

FXG vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXG vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison

FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than PHDG's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
2.90%2.83%1.70%1.41%1.83%1.38%1.41%1.63%2.31%1.34%1.72%1.67%
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
1.86%2.10%1.94%1.93%1.35%0.44%0.63%1.80%1.56%1.83%2.29%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXG and PHDG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXG has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to PHDG (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs PHDG's -17.70%.

On 10-year performance, PHDG leads with 7.22% vs 4.23% for FXG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PHDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PHDG has performed better with a 7.22% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.

FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.86% for PHDG.

FXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PHDG is Equity Hedged. FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.39% for PHDG.

PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXG and PHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer