FXF vs. XMMO
FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXF returned 1.25%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
FXF vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 1.25%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.
FXF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.25%
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
FXF vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.20% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXF and XMMO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2006 | 0.04 |
The correlation between FXF and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXF vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
FXF
XMMO
FXF vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXF | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 4.45 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 18.21 | -16.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXF | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.99 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.78 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.89 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.58 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
FXF vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXF | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -55.37% | +19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.82% | -8.34% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -24.93% | +16.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.03% | -27.91% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.04% | -36.74% | +21.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.53% | 0.00% | -18.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | -9.45% | -11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.04% | +0.11% |
Volatility
FXF vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) is 1.69%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that FXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXF | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 7.82% | -6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.56% | 15.54% | -9.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.51% | 18.71% | -11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 21.45% | -13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 22.27% | -14.70% |
FXF vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXF vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXF and XMMO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to FXF (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 1.25% for FXF. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
FXF is categorized as Currency, while XMMO is Momentum. FXF tracks Swiss Franc, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXF and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXF and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer