FXF vs. PG
FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) is Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FXF returned 1.06%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FXF vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 1.06%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
FXF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.06%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
FXF vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.80% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXF and PG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006 | 0.07 |
The correlation between FXF and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXF vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
FXF
PG
FXF vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXF | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.97 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | -0.37 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | -0.68 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXF vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXF | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -54.25% | +18.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -15.52% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -21.15% | +12.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.68% | -23.77% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.04% | -23.77% | +8.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.02% | -13.29% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -12.16% | -8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 8.80% | -6.52% |
Volatility
FXF vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) is 1.81%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that FXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXF | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 6.99% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.56% | 15.01% | -9.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 18.78% | -11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 17.82% | -9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 19.05% | -11.48% |
Dividends
FXF vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXF and PG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to FXF (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs PG's -54.25%.
FXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXF and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer