PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXED vs. RULE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXED vs. RULE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXED achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than RULE's 42.32% return.


FXED

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
0.05%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*

RULE

1D
-0.59%
1M
7.59%
YTD
42.32%
6M
39.96%
1Y
46.18%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXED vs. RULE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FXED
Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF
-0.63%5.77%5.18%15.09%-14.68%0.82%
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
42.32%4.60%7.59%6.29%-22.87%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FXED and RULE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.34

The correlation between FXED and RULE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXED vs. RULE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXED
FXED Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FXED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXED Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FXED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXED Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

RULE
RULE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXED vs. RULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXEDRULEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.36

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.67

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

14.09

-12.45

FXED vs. RULE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXED Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the RULE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXED and RULE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXED vs. RULE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXED drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum RULE drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXED and RULE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXEDRULEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-30.48%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.36%

-12.65%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.96%

-20.21%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-5.01%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-14.83%

+10.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.29%

-1.26%

Volatility

FXED vs. RULE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) is 1.72%, while Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that FXED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RULE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXEDRULEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

13.02%

-11.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.29%

20.70%

-15.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81%

23.29%

-16.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.76%

15.69%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

15.69%

-7.13%

FXED vs. RULE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXED has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than RULE's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXED vs. RULE - Dividend Comparison

FXED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, while RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FXED
Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF
7.18%6.96%6.70%5.65%5.94%4.59%
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.01%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXED and RULE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RULE has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to FXED (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXED dropped -19.70% vs RULE's -30.48%.

On 3-year performance, RULE leads with 19.21% vs 6.78% for FXED. On fees, RULE is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, FXED has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RULE has performed better with a 19.21% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RULE is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 2.33% for FXED.

FXED has the higher dividend yield at 7.18%, compared with 0.00% for RULE.

They also come from different issuers: Sound Income Strategies and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.33% for FXED and 1.10% for RULE.

RULE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXED and RULE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer