PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FXC vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FXC vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FXC (Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXC is a Currency fund tracking the Canadian Dollar, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXC returned -0.15%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for XMMO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

FXC vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXC achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 22.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FXC has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of -0.15%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.66% annualized return.

FXC

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
1.05%
1Y
-0.81%
3Y*
0.26%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
-0.15%

XMMO

1D
2.16%
1M
6.07%
YTD
22.96%
6M
24.84%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
31.83%
5Y*
16.81%
10Y*
19.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXC vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXC
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust		-0.74%5.24%-5.96%4.35%-6.44%0.22%1.92%5.94%-7.54%6.72%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF		22.96%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FXC and XMMO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2006

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between FXC and XMMO has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF

Often compared with FXC:
FXC vs. FXEFXC vs. USOFXC vs. QQQFXC vs. FXBFXC vs. TLTFXC vs. XLKFXC vs. GLD
Often compared with XMMO:
XMMO vs. SPMOXMMO vs. XMHQXMMO vs. VOOXMMO vs. MTUMXMMO vs. QMOMXMMO vs. SPGPXMMO vs. RFV

Return for Risk

FXC vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FXC
FXC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXC vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FXCXMMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.18

2.01

-2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.24

2.80

-3.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.35

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

4.53

-4.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.32

18.56

-18.87

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXC vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXC Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXC and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FXCXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

2.01

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.79

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.89

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.57

-0.62

Drawdowns

FXC vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXC drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC and XMMO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FXCXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-55.37%

+19.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.78%

-8.34%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.34%

-24.93%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.53%

-27.91%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.46%

-36.74%

+21.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.56%

0.00%

-28.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.91%

-9.45%

-10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.04%

-0.06%

Volatility

FXC vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) is 0.69%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that FXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FXCXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

7.82%

-7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

15.59%

-12.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.49%

18.71%

-14.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

21.45%

-15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

22.27%

-15.61%

FXC vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXC vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

FXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than XMMO's 0.61% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXC
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust		0.26%0.55%2.23%2.01%0.31%0.00%0.19%0.75%0.42%0.02%0.00%0.02%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF		0.61%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

FXC and XMMO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to FXC (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXC dropped -35.39% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.66% vs -0.15% for FXC. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXC has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.66% return vs -0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXC.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.26% for FXC.

FXC is categorized as Currency, while XMMO is Momentum. FXC tracks Canadian Dollar, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXC and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXC and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer