FXC vs. UGA
FXC (Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FXC is a Currency fund tracking the Canadian Dollar, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXC returned -0.15%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for UGA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
FXC vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXC achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FXC has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of -0.15%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.
FXC
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- -0.81%
- 3Y*
- 0.26%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
UGA
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- 75.83%
- 6M
- 64.53%
- 1Y
- 82.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
FXC vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXC Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust | -0.74% | 5.24% | -5.96% | 4.35% | -6.44% | 0.22% | 1.92% | 5.94% | -7.54% | 6.72% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.83% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXC and UGA is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2008 | 0.35 |
The correlation between FXC and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXC vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
FXC
UGA
FXC vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | 2.35 | -2.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 2.78 | -3.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.38 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 5.82 | -5.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 14.25 | -14.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 2.35 | -2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.74 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.39 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.12 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
FXC vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXC drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -86.59% | +51.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.78% | -14.88% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | -26.68% | +19.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.53% | -38.11% | +24.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.46% | -75.89% | +60.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.56% | -12.18% | -16.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -36.77% | +16.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 6.08% | -4.10% |
Volatility
FXC vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) is 0.69%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that FXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 12.41% | -11.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.25% | 30.41% | -27.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.49% | 35.21% | -30.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.37% | 34.38% | -28.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 37.27% | -30.61% |
FXC vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXC vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
FXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXC Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust | 0.26% | 0.55% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.75% | 0.42% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXC and UGA have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to FXC (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXC dropped -35.39% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.46% vs -0.15% for FXC. On fees, FXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FXC has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.46% return vs -0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
FXC has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
FXC is categorized as Currency, while UGA is Oil & Gas. FXC tracks Canadian Dollar, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXC and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXC and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer