FXC vs. BPH
FXC (Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXC is a Currency fund tracking the Canadian Dollar, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. FXC is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. FXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
FXC vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXC
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- -1.04%
- 3Y*
- 0.12%
- 5Y*
- -1.87%
- 10Y*
- -0.20%
BPH
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXC vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FXC Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust | -0.60% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXC and BPH is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXC vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
FXC
BPH
FXC vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 9.48 | -9.53 |
Drawdowns
FXC vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXC drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -2.35% | -33.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.86% | 0.00% | -28.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -1.08% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility
FXC vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.50% | 25.75% | -21.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.37% | 25.75% | -19.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 25.75% | -19.09% |
FXC vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXC vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
FXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXC Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust | 0.26% | 0.55% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.75% | 0.42% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXC and BPH have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXC.
FXC has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.
FXC is categorized as Currency, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXC and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for FXC and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer