PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXB vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXB vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FXB

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
0.38%
6M
1.56%
1Y
1.45%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
0.00%

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXB vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FXB and BPH is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXB vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXB
FXB Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXB Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BPH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXB vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXBBPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

FXB vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXBBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

9.48

-9.55

Drawdowns

FXB vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXB drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXB and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXBBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-2.35%

-46.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.55%

0.00%

-29.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.54%

-1.08%

-26.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

FXB vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXBBPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.54%

25.75%

-19.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.48%

25.75%

-17.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

25.75%

-16.45%

FXB vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXB vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

FXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXB
Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust
2.20%2.44%3.25%2.59%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXB and BPH have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXB.

FXB has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

FXB is categorized as Currency, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXB and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXB and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer