FXB vs. BPH
FXB (Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXB is a Currency fund tracking the British Pound, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. FXB is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. FXB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
FXB vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXB
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 1.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 0.00%
BPH
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXB vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FXB Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust | -0.17% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXB and BPH is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXB vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
FXB
BPH
FXB vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXB | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXB | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 9.48 | -9.55 |
Drawdowns
FXB vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXB drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXB and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXB | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.99% | -2.35% | -46.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.55% | 0.00% | -29.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.54% | -1.08% | -26.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | — | — |
Volatility
FXB vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXB | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.54% | 25.75% | -19.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 25.75% | -17.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 25.75% | -16.45% |
FXB vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXB vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
FXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXB Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust | 2.20% | 2.44% | 3.25% | 2.59% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXB and BPH have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXB.
FXB has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.
FXB is categorized as Currency, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXB and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for FXB and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer