FXB vs. BPH
FXB (Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXB is a Currency fund tracking the British Pound, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. FXB is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
FXB vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- -0.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 0.48%
BPH
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXB vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FXB Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust | -1.63% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXB and BPH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXB vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
FXB
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXB vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXB | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXB vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXB drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXB and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXB | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.99% | -9.43% | -39.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.64% | -8.71% | -21.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.54% | -3.18% | -24.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | — | — |
Volatility
FXB vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXB | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.57% | 24.10% | -17.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 24.10% | -15.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.87% | 24.10% | -15.23% |
FXB vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXB vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
FXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than BPH's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXB Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust | 2.24% | 2.44% | 3.25% | 2.59% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXB and BPH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXB.
FXB has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.53% for BPH.
FXB is categorized as Currency, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXB and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for FXB and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer