PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXAIX vs. RLBGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FXAIX having a 8.59% return and RLBGX slightly lower at 8.53%. Over the past 10 years, FXAIX has outperformed RLBGX with an annualized return of 15.44%, while RLBGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.


FXAIX

1D
1.76%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
15.44%

RLBGX

1D
1.58%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.53%
6M
9.48%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
8.59%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
8.53%18.83%15.35%13.92%-11.85%16.10%11.20%18.95%-3.07%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FXAIX and RLBGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.96

The correlation between FXAIX and RLBGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXAIX vs. RLBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RLBGX
RLBGX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RLBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RLBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXAIXRLBGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.17

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

14.03

-1.57

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the RLBGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXAIX and RLBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXAIX drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, which is greater than RLBGX's maximum drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXAIX and RLBGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXAIXRLBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-22.33%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-6.98%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-10.65%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-18.59%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-22.33%

-11.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-1.43%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-2.46%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.57%

+0.38%

Volatility

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) at 3.55%. This indicates that FXAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXAIXRLBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.55%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

7.35%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

9.13%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

10.56%

+6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

10.70%

+7.40%

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXAIX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RLBGX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FXAIX vs. RLBGX - Dividend Comparison

FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than RLBGX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.06%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
7.11%8.56%7.50%2.27%2.63%4.59%4.65%3.78%5.81%4.92%4.54%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FXAIX and RLBGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXAIX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to RLBGX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXAIX dropped -33.79% vs RLBGX's -22.33%.

RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXAIX and RLBGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer