FWRG.L vs. SMH.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) and SMH.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FWRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while SMH.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWRG.L returned 29.06% vs 154.67% for SMH.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWRG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.L.

Performance

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRG.L achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 87.70% return.

FWRG.L

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 12.05%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 29.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH.L

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 10.70%
• YTD: 87.70%
• 6M: 88.16%
• 1Y: 154.67%
• 3Y*: 61.84%
• 5Y*: 36.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	12.05%	13.84%	20.11%	8,531.38%
SMH.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	87.70%	49.20%	24.11%	21.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRG.L and SMH.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.68

The correlation between FWRG.L and SMH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FWRG.L	SMH.L
Technology	32.2%	100.0%
Financial Services	16.4%	-
Industrials	10.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	-
Communication Services	8.2%	-
Healthcare	7.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Basic Materials	3.8%	-
Energy	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SMH.L

SMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FWRG.L	SMH.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	4.49	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	4.71	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.60	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	11.05	-7.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.98	38.66	-22.68

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is lower than the SMH.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRG.L and SMH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, smaller than the maximum SMH.L drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRG.L and SMH.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWRG.L	SMH.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.87%	-45.38%	+26.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-13.91%	+6.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.87%	-36.25%	+17.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-6.27%	+5.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-11.16%	+8.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	3.98%	-2.17%

Volatility

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) is 3.62%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that FWRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWRG.L	SMH.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.62%	14.03%	-10.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.25%	27.87%	-19.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	34.42%	-23.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4,460.73%	32.98%	+4,427.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4,460.73%	32.54%	+4,428.19%

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWRG.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWRG.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWRG.L and SMH.L in my portfolio?

FWRG.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWRG.L or SMH.L?

On fees, FWRG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWRG.L or SMH.L?

FWRG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.L.

What is the main difference between FWRG.L and SMH.L?

FWRG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRG.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.