PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWMNX vs. VSMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWMNX achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly higher than VSMPX's 10.79% return.


FWMNX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-1.24%
6M
14.49%
YTD
14.49%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*

VSMPX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.07%
6M
10.79%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FWMNX
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I
14.49%19.13%11.74%21.18%-19.76%19.59%25.28%11.17%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
10.79%17.15%23.26%26.53%-19.50%25.74%21.01%14.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FWMNX and VSMPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FWMNX and VSMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWMNX vs. VSMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWMNX
FWMNX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FWMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FWMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMPX
VSMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VSMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FWMNXVSMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.58

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

11.36

+2.62

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the VSMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWMNX and VSMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWMNX drawdown since its inception was -36.47%, roughly equal to the maximum VSMPX drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWMNX and VSMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWMNXVSMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.47%

-34.97%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-8.92%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.88%

-19.36%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-25.35%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.07%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-4.57%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.02%

+0.15%

Volatility

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) at 5.06%. This indicates that FWMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWMNXVSMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

5.06%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

10.14%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

12.85%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

17.47%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

18.39%

+2.13%

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWMNX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWMNX vs. VSMPX - Dividend Comparison

FWMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than VSMPX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FWMNX
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I
4.87%5.73%0.08%0.66%0.70%2.78%0.26%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.07%1.13%1.27%1.43%1.67%1.22%1.43%1.78%2.05%1.73%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FWMNX and VSMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWMNX has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to VSMPX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWMNX dropped -36.47% vs VSMPX's -34.97%.

FWMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWMNX and VSMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer