PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWMNX vs. VFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWMNX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than VFFSX's 11.56% return.


FWMNX

1D
0.78%
1M
6.51%
YTD
15.19%
6M
15.83%
1Y
37.63%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*

VFFSX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.93%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FWMNX
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I
15.19%19.13%11.74%21.18%-19.76%19.59%25.28%11.17%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
11.56%17.87%25.00%26.28%-18.14%29.24%18.35%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FWMNX and VFFSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FWMNX and VFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWMNX vs. VFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWMNX
FWMNX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FWMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FWMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VFFSX
VFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWMNXVFFSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.88

2.55

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

3.46

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.38

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.20

15.85

+2.35

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the VFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWMNX and VFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWMNXVFFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.55

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.84

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.86

-0.18

Drawdowns

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWMNX drawdown since its inception was -36.47%, which is greater than VFFSX's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWMNX and VFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWMNXVFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.47%

-33.82%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-8.90%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.88%

-18.75%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-24.51%

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-4.51%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.90%

+0.19%

Volatility

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX) at 2.82%. This indicates that FWMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWMNXVFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

2.82%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

8.99%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

11.89%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

16.90%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

18.42%

+2.12%

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWMNX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VFFSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWMNX vs. VFFSX - Dividend Comparison

FWMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than VFFSX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWMNX
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I
4.97%5.73%0.08%0.66%0.70%2.78%0.26%0.27%0.00%0.00%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
1.03%1.14%1.24%1.46%1.70%1.61%1.56%2.15%2.09%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FWMNX and VFFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWMNX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to VFFSX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWMNX dropped -36.47% vs VFFSX's -33.82%.

FWMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWMNX and VFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer