FWLSX vs. JRLVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX).
FWLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 8, 2017. JRLVX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013.
Performance
FWLSX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWLSX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund | -3.44% | 22.76% | 17.95% | 21.00% | -18.55% | 16.88% | 18.48% | 25.96% | -8.33% | 10.11% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | -3.42% | 19.25% | 14.50% | 18.00% | -18.06% | 18.45% | 16.23% | 25.03% | -8.29% | 7.16% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWLSX having a -3.44% return and JRLVX slightly higher at -3.42%.
FWLSX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
JRLVX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWLSX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FWLSX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank
FWLSX
JRLVX
FWLSX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWLSX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.57 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.30 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 6.28 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWLSX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.51 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.57 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWLSX and JRLVX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWLSX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison
FWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than JRLVX's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund | 3.25% | 3.14% | 7.07% | 2.36% | 5.59% | 9.05% | 5.80% | 7.02% | 8.16% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | 3.68% | 3.55% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 8.03% | 6.00% | 4.26% | 8.99% | 10.96% | 4.29% | 3.40% | 1.90% |
Drawdowns
FWLSX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWLSX and JRLVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWLSX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.32% | -32.53% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -11.23% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.40% | -25.64% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.49% | -8.50% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -4.61% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.33% | +0.22% |
Volatility
FWLSX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 4.70%. This indicates that FWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWLSX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 4.70% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 8.47% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 15.32% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 14.69% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 15.94% | +0.12% |