FWIFX vs. GLOSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FWIFX (Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I) and GLOSX (Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FWIFX returned 15.13%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for GLOSX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWIFX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GLOSX.

Performance

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWIFX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than GLOSX's 16.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FWIFX has outperformed GLOSX with an annualized return of 15.13%, while GLOSX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.95% annualized return.

FWIFX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 8.02%
• YTD: 20.77%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 41.08%
• 3Y*: 25.45%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: 15.13%

GLOSX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 5.41%
• YTD: 16.09%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 41.34%
• 3Y*: 25.80%
• 5Y*: 15.22%
• 10Y*: 13.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I	20.77%	16.11%	27.63%	24.92%	-25.72%	18.43%	30.92%	28.94%	-4.56%	29.58%
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A	16.09%	41.25%	11.45%	16.70%	-9.75%	23.28%	17.79%	23.30%	-16.32%	21.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FWIFX and GLOSX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009	0.90

The correlation between FWIFX and GLOSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FWIFX vs. GLOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWIFX

FWIFX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FWIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FWIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FWIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FWIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FWIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

GLOSX

GLOSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GLOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GLOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
GLOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GLOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWIFX	GLOSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	3.16	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	4.18	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.57	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	4.16	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.47	16.78	-1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the GLOSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWIFX and GLOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWIFX	GLOSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	3.16	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.98	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.83	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.49	+0.30

Drawdowns

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWIFX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum GLOSX drawdown of -54.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWIFX and GLOSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWIFX	GLOSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-54.40%	+20.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-10.04%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-14.66%	-7.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.71%	-23.72%	-9.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.71%	-33.59%	-0.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-9.79%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	2.49%	+0.22%

Volatility

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) at 4.31%. This indicates that FWIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWIFX	GLOSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	4.31%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.72%	10.25%	+3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	13.28%	+4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.92%	15.59%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	16.84%	+1.97%

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWIFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GLOSX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWIFX vs. GLOSX - Dividend Comparison

FWIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, less than GLOSX's 9.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I	9.63%	11.63%	14.80%	0.93%	6.23%	12.86%	8.16%	4.93%	9.72%	6.94%	1.17%	3.88%
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A	9.93%	11.53%	7.73%	1.55%	6.04%	21.00%	0.87%	0.93%	10.44%	1.27%	1.25%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWIFX and GLOSX in my portfolio?

FWIFX and GLOSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FWIFX or GLOSX?

FWIFX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to GLOSX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWIFX dropped -33.71% vs GLOSX's -54.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.