FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L
FWEA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc) and IGLT.L (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FWEA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while IGLT.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWEA.DE returned 26.93% vs 0.93% for IGLT.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FWEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IGLT.L.
Performance
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FWEA.DE is traded in EUR, while IGLT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IGLT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWEA.DE achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than IGLT.L's 0.53% return.
FWEA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLT.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 0.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.31%
- 5Y*
- -4.48%
- 10Y*
- -2.01%
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWEA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc | 10.78% | 17.53% | 19.21% | 8.62% |
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 0.53% | -0.76% | 1.32% | 6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWEA.DE and IGLT.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.27 |
The correlation between FWEA.DE and IGLT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L — Risk / Return Rank
FWEA.DE
IGLT.L
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE) and iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FWEA.DE | IGLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.02 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 0.16 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 0.34 | +13.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.48%, smaller than the maximum IGLT.L drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWEA.DE and IGLT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWEA.DE | IGLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.48% | -37.12% | +19.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -4.89% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -24.98% | +24.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -11.38% | +9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.21% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE) is 3.66%, while iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that FWEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWEA.DE | IGLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.98% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 6.68% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 8.32% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 11.91% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 11.23% | +1.54% |
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLT.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FWEA.DE vs. IGLT.L - Dividend Comparison
FWEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWEA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 4.47% | 4.26% | 3.69% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FWEA.DE and IGLT.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLT.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLT.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FWEA.DE.
FWEA.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IGLT.L is Government Bonds. FWEA.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index, while IGLT.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FWEA.DE and 0.07% for IGLT.L.
Find the right allocation for FWEA.DE and IGLT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer