PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FWEA.DE is traded in EUR, while FTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FTWG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWEA.DE achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than FTWG.L's 12.86% return.


FWEA.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.41%
YTD
10.64%
6M
11.85%
1Y
26.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTWG.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.18%
YTD
12.86%
6M
13.56%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWEA.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.64%17.53%19.21%7.17%
FTWG.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist
12.86%8.17%25.71%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FWEA.DE and FTWG.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.81

The correlation between FWEA.DE and FTWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWEA.DE
FWEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FTWG.L
FTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWEA.DEFTWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.91

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

16.30

-2.78

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWEA.DE and FTWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWEA.DEFTWG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.42

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

1.42

+0.10

Drawdowns

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.48%, smaller than the maximum FTWG.L drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWEA.DE and FTWG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWEA.DEFTWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-20.29%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-6.81%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.59%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-2.48%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.64%

+0.31%

Volatility

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) at 2.86%. This indicates that FWEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWEA.DEFTWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.86%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

7.86%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

10.99%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

12.83%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.72%

12.83%

-0.11%

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FWEA.DE vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison

FWEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTWG.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.22%1.34%1.50%0.70%
FWEA.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWEA.DE and FTWG.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTWG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FWEA.DE.

Both ETFs track FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FWEA.DE and 0.15% for FTWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWEA.DE and FTWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer