PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWCFX vs. NEFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWCFX having a 21.00% return and NEFFX slightly higher at 21.78%. Over the past 10 years, FWCFX has underperformed NEFFX with an annualized return of 16.64%, while NEFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.52% annualized return.


FWCFX

1D
1.23%
1M
1.70%
YTD
21.00%
6M
19.58%
1Y
33.92%
3Y*
30.86%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
16.64%

NEFFX

1D
1.61%
1M
1.18%
YTD
21.78%
6M
21.29%
1Y
45.14%
3Y*
30.71%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
17.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWCFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C
21.00%14.91%47.60%23.61%-26.54%17.21%29.53%27.53%-5.55%28.20%
NEFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2
21.78%31.31%23.87%29.47%-29.50%12.31%33.79%26.75%-4.17%34.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FWCFX and NEFFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009

0.93

The correlation between FWCFX and NEFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWCFX vs. NEFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWCFX
FWCFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FWCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FWCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NEFFX
NEFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NEFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FWCFXNEFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.51

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

15.11

-2.52

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the NEFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWCFX and NEFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, smaller than the maximum NEFFX drawdown of -45.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWCFX and NEFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWCFXNEFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.39%

-45.12%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-13.32%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.80%

-20.78%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.39%

-36.95%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.39%

-36.95%

+2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.87%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-7.59%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.09%

-0.27%

Volatility

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) is 8.30%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that FWCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWCFXNEFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

8.88%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

15.64%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

18.91%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

19.73%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

19.21%

+0.42%

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWCFX has a 2.08% expense ratio, which is higher than NEFFX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWCFX vs. NEFFX - Dividend Comparison

FWCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, more than NEFFX's 8.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWCFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C
10.02%12.12%29.90%0.00%5.87%12.44%7.99%4.46%9.67%6.44%0.05%3.47%
NEFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2
8.11%9.87%9.61%4.19%0.19%7.55%2.69%7.57%10.31%8.50%2.51%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FWCFX and NEFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NEFFX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to FWCFX (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWCFX dropped -34.39% vs NEFFX's -45.12%.

NEFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWCFX and NEFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer