PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWCFX vs. FIQOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWCFX having a 19.54% return and FIQOX slightly higher at 20.15%.


FWCFX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.51%
YTD
19.54%
6M
18.34%
1Y
33.75%
3Y*
29.96%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
16.24%

FIQOX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.60%
YTD
20.15%
6M
18.97%
1Y
35.29%
3Y*
30.50%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FWCFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C
19.54%14.91%47.60%23.61%-26.54%17.21%29.53%27.53%-10.48%
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
20.15%16.27%46.05%25.10%-25.64%18.58%31.08%29.13%-10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FWCFX and FIQOX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FWCFX and FIQOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWCFX vs. FIQOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWCFX
FWCFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FWCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FWCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQOX
FIQOX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FIQOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FWCFXFIQOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.04

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.13

12.83

-0.70

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FIQOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWCFX and FIQOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, roughly equal to the maximum FIQOX drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWCFX and FIQOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWCFXFIQOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.39%

-33.64%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-11.74%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.80%

-22.59%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.39%

-33.64%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-3.29%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-7.81%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.78%

+0.03%

Volatility

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX) have volatilities of 8.44% and 8.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWCFXFIQOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

8.44%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

15.41%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.92%

18.91%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

20.30%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

21.28%

-1.65%

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWCFX has a 2.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQOX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWCFX vs. FIQOX - Dividend Comparison

FWCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%, more than FIQOX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
9.66%11.60%26.02%1.10%6.51%12.99%8.23%5.09%9.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FWCFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C
10.14%12.12%29.90%0.00%5.87%12.44%7.99%4.46%9.67%6.44%0.05%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FWCFX and FIQOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIQOX has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to FWCFX (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWCFX dropped -34.39% vs FIQOX's -33.64%.

FIQOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWCFX and FIQOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer