FWATX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (FWATX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
FWATX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 2015. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
FWATX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWATX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWATX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A | 0.21% | 13.85% | 9.33% | 11.46% | -13.86% | 17.12% | 16.27% | 22.85% | -3.25% | 5.95% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWATX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FWATX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
FWATX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWATX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWATX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWATX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
FWATX
SICIX
FWATX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (FWATX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWATX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.66 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 2.20 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.19 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 8.95 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWATX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.66 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.84 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.87 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.78 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWATX and SICIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWATX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
FWATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWATX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A | 3.27% | 3.53% | 3.28% | 3.97% | 3.52% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 2.60% | 2.71% | 3.09% | 8.02% | 0.00% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
FWATX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWATX drawdown since its inception was -21.66%, smaller than the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWATX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWATX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.66% | -27.62% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -2.73% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.29% | -10.94% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.66% | -11.61% | -10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -2.39% | -4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.59% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 0.67% | +1.42% |
Volatility
FWATX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (FWATX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that FWATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWATX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 1.24% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.94% | 2.06% | +5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 3.66% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.77% | 3.87% | +5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.78% | 3.89% | +5.89% |