PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWATX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWATX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (FWATX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWATX achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 11.27% return.


FWATX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.90%
YTD
8.71%
6M
8.69%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
12.73%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
8.88%

FNILX

1D
0.30%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.56%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWATX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FWATX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
8.71%13.85%9.33%11.46%-13.86%17.12%16.27%22.85%-4.25%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.27%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FWATX and FNILX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.85

The correlation between FWATX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWATX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWATX
FWATX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FWATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWATX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FWATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWATX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWATX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (FWATX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWATXFNILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

2.50

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

3.38

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.30

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.12

15.12

-3.00

FWATX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWATX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWATX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWATXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.50

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.81

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.76

+0.18

Drawdowns

FWATX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWATX drawdown since its inception was -21.66%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWATX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWATXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.66%

-33.76%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-9.01%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-19.08%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

-25.40%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-5.37%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.97%

-0.11%

Volatility

FWATX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (FWATX) is 2.42%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that FWATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWATXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.88%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

9.00%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.86%

11.95%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.82%

17.25%

-7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.85%

20.04%

-10.19%

FWATX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWATX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWATX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FWATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%
FWATX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
3.18%3.53%3.28%3.97%3.52%2.73%3.18%2.60%2.71%3.09%8.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWATX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to FWATX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWATX dropped -21.66% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWATX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer