PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVWSX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund (FVWSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVWSX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 8.61% return.


FVWSX

1D
0.14%
1M
3.87%
YTD
9.61%
6M
11.67%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
28.31%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
17.75%

SWLGX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.15%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.00%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVWSX
Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund
9.61%22.69%36.47%33.21%-25.74%24.95%31.17%30.57%-2.07%-0.46%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.61%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FVWSX and SWLGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.96

The correlation between FVWSX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVWSX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVWSX
FVWSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FVWSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVWSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVWSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FVWSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVWSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund (FVWSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVWSXSWLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.85

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

2.50

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.76

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.49

5.92

+5.57

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVWSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVWSX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVWSXSWLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.85

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.75

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.80

+0.14

Drawdowns

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVWSX drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, roughly equal to the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVWSX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVWSXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.69%

-32.69%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-16.16%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-23.30%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-32.69%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.37%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-7.05%

+1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

4.80%

-2.43%

Volatility

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund (FVWSX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FVWSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVWSXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.30%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

11.59%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21%

15.40%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

21.49%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

22.68%

-3.29%

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVWSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVWSX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

FVWSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%, more than SWLGX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVWSX
Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund
14.90%16.24%6.57%1.02%8.29%21.40%16.45%9.19%12.34%12.74%2.63%7.00%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.42%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FVWSX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVWSX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to SWLGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVWSX dropped -31.69% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

FVWSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVWSX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer