PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FVUB.L vs. EWA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FVUB.L vs. EWA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FVUB.L (Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF) and EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVUB.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil NR USD, while EWA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVUB.L returned 7.06%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for EWA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FVUB.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWA.

Performance

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FVUB.L is traded in GBP, while EWA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWA values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVUB.L achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than EWA's 11.33% return.

FVUB.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-9.72%
YTD
14.58%
6M
9.14%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
—

EWA

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.40%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.57%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF		14.58%35.51%-26.77%26.33%23.83%-15.44%-22.19%-14.94%
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF		11.33%5.28%3.38%8.12%5.27%9.97%5.11%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FVUB.L and EWA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.35

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FVUB.L
EWA

Financial Services

25.4%
43.6%

Energy

20.6%
4.5%

Basic Materials

15.1%
23.0%

Utilities

14.8%
1.7%

Industrials

11.4%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.6%

Healthcare

2.9%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
6.1%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.8%
5.0%

Technology

0.7%
1.1%

Financial Services

FVUB.L
25.4%
EWA
43.6%

Energy

FVUB.L
20.6%
EWA
4.5%

Basic Materials

FVUB.L
15.1%
EWA
23.0%

Utilities

FVUB.L
14.8%
EWA
1.7%

Industrials

FVUB.L
11.4%
EWA
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

FVUB.L
4.0%
EWA
3.6%

Healthcare

FVUB.L
2.9%
EWA
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FVUB.L
2.5%
EWA
6.1%

Communication Services

FVUB.L
2.0%
EWA
2.0%

Real Estate

FVUB.L
0.8%
EWA
5.0%

Technology

FVUB.L
0.7%
EWA
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI-Australia ETF

Often compared with FVUB.L:
FVUB.L vs. ALAU.LFVUB.L vs. ALAG.LFVUB.L vs. XMLA.LFVUB.L vs. FRQX.LFVUB.L vs. XMBR.LFVUB.L vs. FRIN.LFVUB.L vs. FLXE.L
Often compared with EWA:
EWA vs. EWCEWA vs. FLAUEWA vs. EWJEWA vs. EWOEWA vs. ^N225EWA vs. VOOEWA vs. SPY

Return for Risk

FVUB.L vs. EWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FVUB.L
FVUB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
EWA
EWA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FVUB.LEWADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.67
1.05

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.26
1.50

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.71

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

4.84

+3.51

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the EWA Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVUB.L and EWA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FVUB.LEWADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.05

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.40

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.43

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.27

-0.27

Drawdowns

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVUB.L drawdown since its inception was -58.22%, which is greater than EWA's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVUB.L and EWA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FVUB.LEWADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.22%

-53.30%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.83%

-8.82%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-21.08%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.42%

-21.08%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.23%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.83%

-3.19%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.79%

-9.57%

-18.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.10%

+1.28%

Volatility

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) at 4.73%. This indicates that FVUB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FVUB.LEWADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

4.73%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.17%

11.55%

+6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

14.34%

+7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

16.32%

+9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.39%

21.00%

+10.39%

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVUB.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EWA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVUB.L vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison

FVUB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF		2.90%3.21%3.71%3.72%5.28%5.08%2.02%3.97%6.11%4.44%4.03%5.48%
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FVUB.L and EWA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FVUB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVUB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWA.

FVUB.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EWA is Asia Pacific Equities. FVUB.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FVUB.L and 0.50% for EWA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVUB.L and EWA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer