PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVRR vs. BRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FVRR vs. BRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and Brady Corporation (BRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVRR achieves a -44.13% return, which is significantly lower than BRC's 16.05% return.


FVRR

1D
1.10%
1M
11.97%
6M
-39.14%
YTD
-44.13%
1Y
-59.46%
3Y*
-26.20%
5Y*
-46.02%
10Y*

BRC

1D
1.34%
1M
11.38%
6M
10.30%
YTD
16.05%
1Y
32.23%
3Y*
25.80%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVRR vs. BRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
-44.13%-37.72%16.57%-6.59%-74.37%-41.72%730.21%-9.62%
BRC
Brady Corporation
16.05%7.60%27.69%26.91%-10.91%3.75%-6.00%19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FVRR and BRC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.18

The correlation between FVRR and BRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FVRR:

$396.90M

BRC:

$4.25B

EPS

FVRR:

$0.78

BRC:

$4.39

PE Ratio

FVRR:

14.15

BRC:

20.54

PEG Ratio

FVRR:

0.07

BRC:

1.62

PS Ratio

FVRR:

0.95

BRC:

2.66

PB Ratio

FVRR:

0.96

BRC:

3.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

FVRR:

$429.22M

BRC:

$1.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FVRR:

$348.84M

BRC:

$828.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

FVRR:

$33.15M

BRC:

$300.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVRR vs. BRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVRR
FVRR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FVRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVRR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FVRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVRR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BRC
BRC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVRR vs. BRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and Brady Corporation (BRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVRRBRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.23

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

1.20

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

3.57

-4.98

FVRR vs. BRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVRR Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the BRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVRR and BRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVRR vs. BRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVRR drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, which is greater than BRC's maximum drawdown of -65.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVRR and BRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVRRBRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.02%

-65.62%

-31.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.67%

-26.12%

-38.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.86%

-26.12%

-46.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-26.12%

-70.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.58%

-5.87%

-90.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.97%

-14.40%

-53.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.89%

8.80%

+34.09%

Volatility

FVRR vs. BRC - Volatility Comparison

Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a higher volatility of 18.08% compared to Brady Corporation (BRC) at 6.95%. This indicates that FVRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVRRBRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.08%

6.95%

+11.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.53%

29.61%

+11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.24%

33.51%

+16.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.25%

26.22%

+38.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.88%

28.01%

+42.87%

Dividends

FVRR vs. BRC - Dividend Comparison

FVRR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRC
Brady Corporation
1.09%1.23%1.28%1.58%1.92%1.64%1.65%1.49%1.92%2.17%2.16%3.49%
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FVRR vs. BRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiverr International Ltd. and Brady Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
105.49M
435.24M
(FVRR) Total Revenue
(BRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FVRR vs. BRC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiverr International Ltd. and Brady Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
81.4%
51.8%
Portfolio components
FVRR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 85.83M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

BRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brady Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.47M and revenue of 435.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

FVRR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 8.50M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

BRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brady Corporation reported an operating income of 73.21M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

FVRR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 8.56M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

BRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brady Corporation reported a net income of 57.80M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FVRR and BRC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVRR has higher volatility (18.08%) compared to BRC (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVRR dropped -97.02% vs BRC's -65.62%.

BRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVRR and BRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer