FVLZX vs. NAMAX
FVLZX (Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z) and NAMAX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FVLZX returned 11.53%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for NAMAX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVLZX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for NAMAX.
Performance
FVLZX vs. NAMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVLZX achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly lower than NAMAX's 22.50% return.
FVLZX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 19.83%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 36.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
NAMAX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 21.50%
- 1Y
- 37.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
FVLZX vs. NAMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVLZX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z | 19.83% | 11.42% | 10.52% | 19.91% | -9.03% | 35.26% | 9.97% | 32.00% | -17.68% | 11.68% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 22.50% | 13.77% | 13.14% | 9.65% | -9.33% | 32.28% | 6.90% | 31.56% | -18.46% | 12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVLZX and NAMAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FVLZX and NAMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVLZX vs. NAMAX — Risk / Return Rank
FVLZX
NAMAX
FVLZX vs. NAMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z (FVLZX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVLZX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 4.62 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 18.02 | -4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVLZX vs. NAMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVLZX drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum NAMAX drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVLZX and NAMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVLZX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.54% | -60.44% | +11.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -8.49% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.31% | -20.90% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -20.90% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | 0.00% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -8.49% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.17% | +0.53% |
Volatility
FVLZX vs. NAMAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z (FVLZX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) at 4.58%. This indicates that FVLZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVLZX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.58% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 10.84% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 14.31% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 18.12% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 20.09% | +2.56% |
FVLZX vs. NAMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVLZX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NAMAX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVLZX vs. NAMAX - Dividend Comparison
FVLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than NAMAX's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVLZX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z | 7.13% | 8.55% | 12.70% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 4.79% | 0.75% | 3.45% | 15.28% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.08% | 6.71% | 7.07% | 0.74% | 6.39% | 8.99% | 3.22% | 3.38% | 27.38% | 21.08% | 8.07% | 17.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVLZX and NAMAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVLZX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to NAMAX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVLZX dropped -48.54% vs NAMAX's -60.44%.
NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVLZX and NAMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer