PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVLZX vs. PVMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z (FVLZX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVLZX achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly higher than PVMIX's 11.26% return.


FVLZX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.07%
YTD
16.42%
6M
19.34%
1Y
36.44%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*

PVMIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.88%
YTD
11.26%
6M
11.84%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVLZX
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z
16.42%11.42%10.52%19.91%-9.03%35.26%9.97%32.00%-17.68%11.68%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
11.26%6.09%33.38%11.04%-5.95%30.97%6.50%26.69%-11.07%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FVLZX and PVMIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FVLZX and PVMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVLZX vs. PVMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVLZX
FVLZX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FVLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FVLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PVMIX
PVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z (FVLZX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVLZXPVMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.62

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.24

2.43

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.52

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.09

8.96

+4.13

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVLZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the PVMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVLZX and PVMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVLZXPVMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.62

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.63

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVLZX drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum PVMIX drawdown of -56.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVLZX and PVMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVLZXPVMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.54%

-56.76%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-7.37%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.31%

-16.78%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-17.05%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-6.84%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.07%

+0.62%

Volatility

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z (FVLZX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) at 3.01%. This indicates that FVLZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVLZXPVMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.01%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

8.45%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

11.73%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

18.24%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.67%

19.21%

+3.46%

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVLZX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PVMIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVLZX vs. PVMIX - Dividend Comparison

FVLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than PVMIX's 6.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVLZX
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class Z
7.34%8.55%12.70%1.17%0.78%4.79%0.75%3.45%15.28%3.66%0.00%0.00%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
6.49%7.22%33.98%4.63%7.12%11.44%1.38%5.11%13.23%6.92%1.58%11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FVLZX and PVMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVLZX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to PVMIX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVLZX dropped -48.54% vs PVMIX's -56.76%.

FVLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVLZX and PVMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer