PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVLKX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVLKX achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than FSMDX's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FVLKX has outperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 12.52%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.69% annualized return.


FVLKX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.39%
YTD
16.92%
6M
18.17%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
12.52%

FSMDX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.12%
YTD
12.78%
6M
12.57%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
11.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVLKX
Fidelity Value Fund Class K
16.92%11.37%14.64%19.65%-8.91%35.38%9.41%31.92%-17.56%14.09%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
12.78%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FVLKX and FSMDX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.94

The correlation between FVLKX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVLKX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVLKX
FVLKX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FVLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FVLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVLKXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.87

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

11.06

+2.71

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVLKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVLKX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVLKXFSMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.75

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.46

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.61

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.70

-0.30

Drawdowns

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVLKX drawdown since its inception was -62.82%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVLKX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVLKXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.82%

-40.35%

-22.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.86%

-8.16%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.39%

-20.92%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-26.07%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.62%

-40.35%

-8.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-4.96%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.11%

+0.58%

Volatility

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 3.31%. This indicates that FVLKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVLKXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.31%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

9.93%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

13.42%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

18.26%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

19.32%

+4.08%

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVLKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVLKX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FVLKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.58%, more than FSMDX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.98%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
FVLKX
Fidelity Value Fund Class K
8.58%10.03%20.95%3.80%7.16%9.87%1.06%3.43%16.38%3.37%1.36%11.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FVLKX and FSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVLKX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to FSMDX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVLKX dropped -62.82% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FVLKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVLKX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer