FVC vs. QCLN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN).

FVC and QCLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FVC is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 2016. QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007. Both FVC and QCLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FVC vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FVC vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF	-4.24%	2.12%	12.43%	-4.59%	-6.03%	21.92%	12.71%	19.28%	-8.60%	19.74%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	4.23%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVC achieves a -4.24% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FVC has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 6.62%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.

FVC

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -7.44%
• YTD: -4.24%
• 6M: -2.60%
• 1Y: 1.27%
• 3Y*: 3.49%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: 6.62%

QCLN

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 62.76%
• 3Y*: -3.26%
• 5Y*: -7.25%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVC vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

FVC

First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF

QCLN

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund

Return for Risk

FVC vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVC

FVC Risk / Return Rank: 14
FVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FVC Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FVC Martin Ratio Rank: 15

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 87
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVC vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVC	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	1.67	-1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	2.28	-2.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.28	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	3.81	-3.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.47	11.86	-11.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVC vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVC and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVC	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10	1.67	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	-0.19	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.37	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.14	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between FVC and QCLN is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FVC vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than QCLN's 0.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF	2.35%	2.57%	0.78%	1.89%	1.50%	0.09%	0.21%	1.07%	0.24%	0.63%	0.67%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.22%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Drawdowns

FVC vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVC and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVC	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-76.18%	+45.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.32%	-16.18%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.62%	-69.49%	+46.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.96%	-71.73%	+40.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.72%	-46.16%	+35.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-43.54%	+36.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	5.20%	-2.10%

Volatility

FVC vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) is 7.51%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that FVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVC	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	14.18%	-6.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	27.32%	-16.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	37.76%	-24.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.30%	37.87%	-21.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.54%	34.63%	-17.09%