PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FV vs. TILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FV vs. TILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly lower than TILT's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FV has underperformed TILT with an annualized return of 12.68%, while TILT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.


FV

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.42%
6M
10.02%
YTD
14.18%
1Y
19.42%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
12.68%
ALL TIME*
11.31%

TILT

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.64%
6M
12.46%
YTD
15.05%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
13.88%
ALL TIME*
14.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.13M$4.25M$4.82M
$925.99K$1.20M$1.57M

FV vs. TILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
14.18%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-8.27%19.97%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
15.05%16.59%19.88%24.70%-17.25%27.61%16.05%29.01%-8.93%18.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and TILT is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014

0.86

The correlation between FV and TILT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FV vs. TILT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FV
TILT

Technology

54.8%
29.8%

Healthcare

20.5%
9.8%

Industrials

14.5%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
10.5%

Communication Services

2.6%
8.0%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.9%

Energy

0.1%
3.9%

Financial Services

0.1%
16.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

FV
54.8%
TILT
29.8%

Healthcare

FV
20.5%
TILT
9.8%

Industrials

FV
14.5%
TILT
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FV
7.3%
TILT
10.5%

Communication Services

FV
2.6%
TILT
8.0%

Real Estate

FV
0.7%
TILT
2.9%

Energy

FV
0.1%
TILT
3.9%

Financial Services

FV
0.1%
TILT
16.3%

Basic Materials

FV

-

TILT
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

FV

-

TILT
4.6%

Utilities

FV

-

TILT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FV vs. TILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

TILT
TILT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FV vs. TILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVTILTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.14

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

13.53

-8.84

FV vs. TILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the TILT Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and TILT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FV vs. TILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum TILT drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and TILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVTILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-38.46%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-8.51%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

-19.85%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-24.12%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-38.46%

+4.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.50%

-0.24%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-4.19%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

1.97%

+2.18%

Volatility

FV vs. TILT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) at 3.62%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVTILTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

3.62%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

9.72%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

12.73%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

17.42%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

18.71%

+2.86%

FV vs. TILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than TILT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FV vs. TILT - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than TILT's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.51%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
1.04%1.15%1.23%1.44%1.60%1.16%1.49%1.54%1.97%1.55%1.60%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FV and TILT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FV has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to TILT (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs TILT's -38.46%.

On 10-year performance, TILT leads with 13.88% vs 12.68% for FV. On fees, TILT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TILT has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TILT has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TILT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

TILT has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.51% for FV.

FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TILT is Large Cap Blend Equities. FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.25% for TILT.

TILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FV and TILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer