FV vs. NACP
FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FV tracks the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FV returned 10.37%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FV charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
FV vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
FV
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 6M
- 18.84%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
FV vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 18.14% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 25.73% | -17.88% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FV and NACP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FV and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
FV vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FV
NACP
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FV
NACP
Industrials
FV
NACP
Financial Services
FV
NACP
Healthcare
FV
NACP
Energy
FV
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
FV
NACP
Communication Services
FV
NACP
Real Estate
FV
NACP
Basic Materials
FV
-
NACP
Consumer Defensive
FV
-
NACP
Utilities
FV
-
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FV vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
FV
NACP
FV vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FV | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.54 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.56 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 20.04 | -11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FV | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 3.14 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.92 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.93 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
FV vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FV | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -30.96% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -9.65% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.08% | -19.66% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.08% | -27.89% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -5.75% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.19% | +1.38% |
Volatility
FV vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FV | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.44% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 11.13% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 14.02% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.47% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 18.70% | +2.72% |
FV vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FV vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FV and NACP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to FV (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 10.37% for FV. On fees, NACP is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FV has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NACP is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.52% for FV.
FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FV and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer