FUTY vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUTY returned 9.19%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FUTY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

FUTY vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -2.40% return.

FUTY

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 6M: 5.07%
• 1Y: 11.80%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

GLDM

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -10.20%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.09%
• 1Y: 24.17%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 17.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	4.88%	16.40%	23.20%	-7.46%	1.12%	17.53%	-0.80%	24.89%	3.94%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-2.40%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and GLDM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.16

FUTY vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FUTY	GLDM
Utilities	99.2%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

FUTY vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY

FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 26
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 24

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 27
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FUTY	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.90	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.19	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	1.00	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.88	2.87	+0.01

FUTY vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUTY	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.44%	-24.35%	-12.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-24.35%	+15.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.35%	-24.35%	+7.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-24.35%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.74%	-21.96%	+16.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-6.27%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	8.44%	-4.33%

Volatility

FUTY vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) is 5.63%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that FUTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUTY	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	7.73%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	23.93%	-12.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.43%	27.15%	-12.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.10%	18.13%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	16.98%	+2.08%

FUTY vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FUTY vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	2.57%	2.67%	2.96%	3.31%	2.72%	2.70%	3.07%	2.82%	3.11%	3.03%	3.35%	4.33%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUTY and GLDM in my portfolio?

FUTY and GLDM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FUTY or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to FUTY (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which ETF is better, FUTY or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.41% vs 9.19% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FUTY or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUTY or GLDM?

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FUTY or GLDM?

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between FUTY and GLDM?

FUTY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while GLDM is Gold. FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.